Saturday, March 26, 2016

The Demeaning of Life...Part V

Here’s the next installment…I would say one of the best, inspiration-wise. Most of my readers know at least the rudiments of cell biology, but here’s a look into their workings that should offer some genuine surprises. I believe this section paints a picture of Cellworld unlike any you’ve read about in books, emphasizing some things that are typically downplayed or not even mentioned. Truly amazing stuff….

V.  The Cell is Beyond Beyond Belief


Cells are the atoms of life, and life is what cells do.
                                                                            
        Franklin M. Harold, In Search of Cell History

We have learned to appreciate the complexity and perfection of the cellular mechanisms, miniaturized to the utmost at the molecular level, which reveal within the cell an unparalleled knowledge of the laws of physics and chemistry…. If we examine the accomplishments of man in his most advanced endeavours, in theory and in practice, we find that the cell has done all this long before him, with greater resourcefulness and much greater efficiency.
                   
       Albert Claude, from his 1974 Nobel Prize lecture[1]
                            
Consider another illustrative example of unconsciously life-belittling thought. (Such things are so prevalent in our culture that they go unnoticed, in the same manner that people unwittingly adopt advertising slogans as figures of speech.)  

How many times have you come across a commonly used expression: “primitive life form”? Most of us, without pause, instantly conjure vague mental images of a worm-like organism…something with very few “moving parts,” something considerably less complicated than its modern-day descendants. In the same way, single-celled creatures are persistently viewed as being simple compared to higher forms. These are grave misconceptions; each and every living form is an unbelievably elaborate entity. The simplest known self-sustaining organisms carry out around 550 distinct biochemical processes. Single-celled varieties are merely small, not simple. 

Another quick review to provide a bracing sensation of unalloyed amazement:

People commonly lack awareness of the difference in size between prokaryotes and individual eukaryotic cells.[2] A run-of-the-mill bacterium like E. coli (2 µm) is roughly a thousandth the volume of an average-sized (20 µm) eukayotic cell. This makes it somewhat easier to begin to grasp the fact that while a human body is made up of those 60 trillion—that’s 60,000,000,000,000—cells, there are significantly more prokaryotic microbes colonizing it (number-wise, primarily in the gut) than there are tissue cells. Over ten times more, ladies and gentlemen.

Also unappreciated is the sudden appearance of eukaryotes in the Cambrian period (over 500 million years ago) after three billion years of unicellarity, and the subsequent explosion of multicellular life forms with entirely new subcellular systems—facts not much less amazing or improbable than life’s beginning in terms of the difficulty of explaining how such a radical shift in forms occurred. And made even more mysterious by the question of why it took so long and, unlike so many biological innovations, occurred but once. According to molecular biologist Nick Lane, “The void between bacterial and eukaryotic cells is greater than any other in biology…. [Their origin] looks far more improbable than the evolution of multicellular organisms, or flight, sight, and intelligence. It looks like genuine contingency, as unpredictable as an asteroid impact.”

Eukaryotic cells—for the sake of brevity, what will primarily be under discussion here—are often referred to as “miniaturized factories.” This analogy doesn’t quite capture the true state of affairs; more apt would be to think of them as highly industrialized cities. (A cell’s organelles—its internal organs—are, quite literally, the factories.) But the whole thing is contained within a discrete province invisible to the human eye, with more separate components than a Boeing 747. Paradoxically, this tiny metropolis is immense: there’s room in its interior for millions of busy molecules.

To ponder the frenzied yet perfectly coordinated activity in each and every cell is an almost futile undertaking. Humans simply aren’t equipped to form mental images of what actually goes on in a cell’s liquid interior. It’s not the scale so much as how things behave in that close-packed setting; everything about it is utterly foreign.

Each cell has an enclosing plasma membrane. Structurally, it is composed of identical molecules called phospholipids, which each have a head end made of hydrophilic (“water loving”) phosphate attached to two lipid tails. Lipids, a fatty substance, are hydrophobic. In water, phospholipids will spontaneously assemble themselves into a two-layered sheet—a lipid bilayer—with the hydrophilic phosphate heads outermost and the water-repelling lipids sandwiched between. The phosphate heads are strongly attracted to one another, forming a resilient outer or intracellular membrane that instantly repairs itself if punctured or damaged. In the words of molecular biologist David Goodsell, “Each individual molecule rotates like a top, and its hydrophobic tails wag and flail. Lipids also slide rapidly past one another, always staying in the sheet, but randomly migrating sideways.”

Lipid bilayers, absolutely critical for all eukaryotic life forms, are functionally ideal in many regards. Small molecules, like oxygen and carbon dioxide, can readily cross the plasma membrane by simple diffusion while it remains impervious to larger ones thanks to the tightly entangled lipid tails. Large constituents—both waste products leaving the cell and essential materials entering—pass through by way of an array of molecular “gatekeepers.” These structures, some quite complex, operate in various ways to allow different classes of chemical substances free passage. Aquaporins, for  instance, are simpler affairs known as channels that allow water molecules to diffuse in and out of the cell. Numerous kinds of receptors, plugged straight through  the membrane, accept messages and pass them into the cell. Others, having received instructions, seize specific molecular prey in passing and drag them through the membrane into the interior. The receptors and gatekeepers imbedded in the surface of a single cell number in the tens or hundreds of thousands, held in place by the same forces that align the phospholipids. And, like phospholipids, the various gates and channels and receptors migrate freely within the confines of the membrane.

The  flexible outer membrane is stiffened by an elaborate internal cytoskeleton, which is able to maintain (or alter) a cell’s characteristic shape while continually changing.[3] It consists of a jungle-like scaffolding of compression-resistant microfilaments and tension-bearing intermediate filaments (that anchor the organelles). A third system of sturdier, hollow microtubules creates transportation and communication networks by furnishing interconnecting conduits for the orderly movement of materials and information. All three types serve multiple purposes. Microtubules and microfilaments are both continually being degraded, renewed, reattached, and re-anchored in new locations. On average, an individual microtubule lasts for only about ten seconds.

A cell’s inner matrix, or cytoplasm, is filled with a liquid—the cytosol—which is around 70% water and close to the same viscosity. Molecules move by normal diffusion through what they experience as a viscous, gel-like substance. Despite the densely crowded environs, they travel almost without restraint through the cytosol in a random walk caused by incessant collisions. Think of bullets ricocheting off one another in a space as crowded as a jar full of beans. Every second, each individual collides with vast numbers of others, the larger ones relentlessly pummeled by water molecules.

Electrons “orbit” atomic nuclei trillions of times per second; particles within the nucleus spin at rates far in excess of that figure. All the contents within a cell are continually tumbling; globular proteins rotate at perhaps a million revolutions per second.[4] It is this mad vibrational energy inherent to atoms and molecules that drives all cellular activities. Things are incessantly zipping through membranes via the aforementioned gates and channels. For example, neurons employ countless ion channels with associated pumps to manipulate the concentration of ions (charged particles, which conduct nerve impulses) and up to ten million of these crucial ions can be pumped through one in a second’s time. Everything takes place at unfathomable speed with countless things happening simultaneously in a riotous molecular tempest.

Most cellular activities are carried out by proteins. These giants of the molecular world, made up of sometimes thousands of amino acid building blocks,[5] are tightly folded into precise shapes that lend them their specific properties. This folding, an innate property, is mostly automatic—the result of individual sections being chemically attracted to or repelled by neighboring portions. The specific form of individual molecules can now be mapped with precision. Computer-assisted graphic representations are a terrific aid in conceptualizing protein complexity and the vast array of often random-appearing forms they take; some look like ornate cumulus clouds…others are symmetrical doughnut-shapes. Many are clearly modular and may have twisting side chains or knobby protrusions. Hidden in their forms are secondary structures: pleated sheets, and alpha helices. All are remarkably elaborate and bewildering to ponder.[6]

David Goodsell again: “A typical bacterium builds several thousand different types of proteins, each with a different function. Our own cells build about 30,000 different kinds, ranging in size from small…hormones like glucagon, which has only 29 amino acids, to huge proteins like titin, which has over 34,000….” Whether individually, in combination, or in teams, each of those 30,000 varieties will perform at least one (sometimes several) of roughly 100,000 specific individual tasks. A cell’s physical components are largely made up of structural proteins, while the other main category, biologically active proteins, assists with all cellular processes.

The latter include those vitally important molecules—enzymes—whose job is to speed up, or catalyze, chemical reactions. Certain extremely important reactions, if not induced by enzymes, wouldn’t move forward at all; others would literally require thousands of years. In some cases they proceed billions of times faster than if left without assistance.[7] With cells, everything has to happen at lightning speeds; any sort of carbon-based life would simply be impossible without catalysts.

An enzyme functions by randomly colliding with a specific target molecule—its  substrate. The substrate has a small region on its own surface that is chemically attracted to a complementary area on the enzyme’s (called an active site), causing them to momentarily bond. Their connection is often compared to a lock-and-key type arrangement, indicative of high specificity. This fleeting association, which causes the protein to change shape while remaining intact, simultaneously lowers the substrate’s activation energy,[8] allowing the reaction to proceed much, much faster than it would otherwise. The substrate is merely altered or splits into new substances; the reaction’s end result (product) floats off. Task complete, a catalyst automatically resumes its usual byzantine form, ready for the next customer. The ratio of catalysts to reactants is extremely small. And for an idea of their efficiency: one of the record holders in terms of speed is carbonic anhydrase: a single molecule can assemble up to one million molecules of carbonic acid per second. (The slowest enzymes require a couple of seconds to catalyze just one reaction.) The more typical rates are still amazingly fast. Understanding how catalysts work, combined with the knowledge that each substrate collides with virtually every enzyme inside the cell in little more than a second goes a long way toward giving a sense of how business proceeds in Cellworld.  

Individual proteins are fashioned into complex assemblages, actual machines, that are built by other proteins. Whether hastily fabricated at a moment’s notice or off duty, these versatile nano-machines undergo constant maintenance (as do lone protein molecules). Fabricated for specific duties, they’re quickly taken apart after the task is complete; in a typical cell, 20–40% of newly made proteins are dismantled within an hour. A number of kinds involved with regulation last for only minutes. Worn-out or damaged individuals, and those being “retired,” are reduced to their modular components for efficient recycling. This essential task is carried out by a teams of machines; smaller helpers assist the giant proteosome. Goodsell writes, “Proteosomes are voracious protein shredders, but all the protein-cutting machinery is carefully hidden away inside a barrel-shaped structure.…[T]he proteosome is able to wander freely inside the cell, and only the proper proteins are fed into its hungry maw.”

Proteins construct all the chemical needs of the cell (including, for instance, carbohydrates and lipids). They make hormones and antibodies. They are responsible for the adhesion of cells within tissues. Proteins churn out actin, the basic molecular component of self-assembling microfilaments. Also self-assembling, the hollow microtubules are made of a protein building block called tubulin.

Intriguingly, some reputable scientists consider it possible that the microtubule system could form part of a sort of cellular computer. No less than physicists Roger Penrose (better known for his work with black holes and relativity theory) and Francis Crick (co-discoverer of DNA) cite the coordinated behavior of cells as indication that they have some kind of information-processing ability. Without offering direct evidence they believe microtubules, which link all parts of the cell’s interior, would be ideal conduits for information transmission.[9]

Proteins are directly involved with other aspects of a cell’s transport system: as types of receptors embedded in both inner and outer membrane surfaces they selectively bind, in the fashion of enzymes, to targeted chemicals. The receptors release their targets after adding molecular tags so that the substance being directed elsewhere will be recognized upon arrival at its destination and permitted entry. Similarly, they also form receptors on the surface of membrane-bound cargo containers called vesicles, which are used to transport materials throughout cells. (These are hauled by molecular motors, small proteins that move by actually walking along microtubules with their relatively massive burdens in tow.) Proteins form the channels, gates, and pumps that regulate the passage of diverse types of chemicals through cell membranes.

In their role of assisting with communication, both within and between cells, these incredibly diverse molecules act as identifying markers on the cell’s surface and as messengers—traveling to specific locations where they bind with some target to elicit a chemical response. (As receptors, they both accept and pass on these messages.) The list of proteins’ absolutely indispensable roles is a long one.

Individual proteins are constructed from chains of amino acids (polypeptides) through the process of translation by one of the cell’s most remarkable machines: the ribosome. These minute factories use copied genetic information, carried from the nucleus by molecules of ribonucleic acid (RNA—specifically, a variety called messenger RNA, or mRNA). Analytical biochemist Roland Hirsch writes:

No simpler machine is known or even imagined that could carry out all of the steps in protein synthesis with such accuracy and speed. Yet no living cell can exist without the means to rapidly and continually synthesize hundreds of proteins over and over again with high fidelity to the code in its DNA. Even the formation of the ribosome itself requires a large number of synchronized steps and more than 100 proteins and 100 small RNA segments.


Ribosomes, the smallest machines known, consist of a large and small subunit that come together only when they attach themselves to a molecule of mRNA.[10] Hundreds of thousands of free-ranging ribosome subunits roam through a cell’s interior at any given time and work in teams to fabricate proteins that stay within the cell; other proteins destined to be excreted (or implanted in membranes as receptors) are assembled by ribosomes fixed in the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum—a flattish, highly folded organelle that surrounds and is actually continuous with the bilayer membrane enveloping the nucleus. ER (as it is generally known) comes in two varieties: smooth and rough. Both are so convoluted that together they comprise around half the membrane surface area in a typical animal cell. Rough ER is so called because its surface, unlike the smooth form, is copiously studded with ribosomes. (To give a sense of their abundance: about 13 million are found on the rough ER within a single human liver cell.) Smooth ER participates in a number of different metabolic processes.

Ribosomes on the rough ER’s surface extrude polypeptide chains as they are being assembled directly into its labyrinthine interior (the cisternal space) as individual free-floating amino acids are added one by one with lightning speed. Once released into the cisternal space, these partially finished proteins have other components added and a destination label affixed while molecules known as chaperones assist with what is otherwise an almost automatic folding process.[11] Other enzymes perform a quality-check, recognizing and removing improperly formed proteins before breaking them down for recycling. 

Partially formed proteins are sent to another organelle, the Golgi apparatus, where they receive further processing before being directed to their destinations. The Golgi (named for the 19th century Italian physician who discovered it) is made up of a series of flattened chambers. Unfinished proteins arrive in vesicles, which merge with the Golgi’s surface like fusing bubbles, spilling their contents inside. After each addition another vesicle, carried by some molecular motor, carries the still incomplete protein to the next chamber for further modification. The Golgi has its own quality-control system. Once complete, the finished protein is carried by one last vesicle to its final destination.

The entire process of protein formation is only one among hundreds of highly involved activities taking place in each and every type of cell. To illustrate the diversity of cell functions, Robert Wesson reports that in the human liver there are

about 500 [different] functions, including: manufacture of bile and other digestive fluids; storage, conversion, and release of carbohydrates; the storage of iron and vitamins; the regulation of fat, cholesterol, and protein metabolism; the manufacture of materials used in the coagulation of blood (some 30 substances); the removal of bacteria from the blood; and the destruction of excess hormones and many toxic substances. And almost all of these functions are performed by cells of a single type.[12]


And then there are those cellular engines, the mitochondria, which are responsible for taking the energy of digested food and converting it into an easily transported form that can be used for most cellular functions. Indeed, they supply most of the energy needs of most non-photosynthetic cells. They have two membranes: a smooth outer one and a much-convoluted inner membrane, studded by protein machinery. Mitochondria are former bacteria that had learned how to handle toxic, highly reactive oxygen in a world that had been without it (until photosynthesis arrived). They invaded—or were engulfed by—a primitive single-celled eukaryote, forming a lasting partnership. (Mitochondria were perhaps the first endosymbionts—organisms that live inside other life forms, in a mutually beneficial rather than parasitic relationship.[13])

To give an idea of their importance and ubiquity: there are hundreds of them in each cell…in some tissues with high energy demands, thousands. A typical eukaryotic cell contains about 300–400 while metabolically active varieties (found in muscle, liver, or brain tissue, for instance) contain hundreds or even some thousands of the minute organelles, occupying up to around 40% of certain cells’ volume. Up to half of a heart cell’s cytosol, for instance, is occupied by mitochondria. There are perhaps 10 million billion—a 1 followed by 16 zeros—in an adult human, making up around 10% of their weight. (A later section will deal with the amazing manner in which they carry our their primary duty. Suffice it to say that they have many roles, also being intimately involved with sex, fertility, and cellular aging.)

Inside any cell, thousands of individual processes are carried out simultaneously by hundreds of thousands of molecular machines, all attending to highly specific tasks. Countless molecules rush headlong through the cell’s crowded interior, ceaselessly colliding with structural supports, conduits, other chemical substances, and interior surfaces…until by chance they come in contact with an enzyme, or dock with one of the thousands of varieties of specific receptor sites. And things happen.

It’s a world of chaotic activity, taking place inside the 60 trillion nano-cities that make up our bodies. Right now. While we sleep. Every day until we die…at which  point that once-vibrant universe is disassembled piece by piece and, sooner or later, turned back into other living things. Atoms from long-dead people, plants, and extinct creatures without number reside inside each of us—all of them originally forged inside several generations of stars and now ceaselessly cycled through Earth’s biosphere. Small wonder that our minds revolt when asked to confront such outlandish notions.                            

But out of such chaos, order is continually seen to emerge. Most of us have been persuaded to believe that the sorts of almost miraculous things described here, awe-inspiring as they might be, are nothing more than the result of chemistry and physics operating on inert matter. Personally speaking: while I have never subscribed to a belief that some supernatural agent’s unseen hand guides what happens in the universe, it’s perfectly reasonable that a religiously inclined person should believe in a Creator-God. What I do find genuinely astonishing is that so many people—the highly intelligent and well-educated—have taken reductionist thinking to its extreme and reached the conclusion that, ultimately, life is nothing more than a vast collection of molecules randomly careening about. And, by extension, that living things are nothing more than machines.

No…it won’t do; the mechanistic view is a portrayal that serves only as versatile analogy. All organisms have machine-like qualities, have components that operate according to machine-like principles, but even the simplest of living forms are elaborate networks of hyper-complex organization with two overarching functions: to be…to be, and remain, alive. And to make more of their kind. They have numerous distinctive qualities that no machine will ever possess. If we hope to someday have a clearer understanding of life beyond how the parts work, it is imperative that some innovative model augment or extend the old—one that encompasses the true nature of nature.


     ©2016 by Tim Forsell      draft                  25 Feb 2016


[1] From his Nobel Prize lecture, Stockholm, 12 Dec 1974. Albert Claude (1899–1983) was a Belgian medical doctor and cell biologist who discovered the process of cell fractionation, which involved grinding up cells and using a centrifuge to isolate their contents. This led to his discovery of the ribosome and several major organelles.
[2] For a general perspective on size: Cells and microorganisms are considered at scales ranging between the nanometer (1 nm is one billionth of a meter) and the micro-meter (1 µm is 1000 nm—one millionth of a meter). At their widest dimensions: a water molecule is about 0.2 nm; a globular protein, 2–4 nm; a small virus, around 30 nm. The smaller bacterial species are in the range of 150–250 nm with the average-sized varieties, 1–10 µm. (The abundant gut bacteria, Escherichia coli, is 1–2 µm.) A human red blood cell, our smallest form, is about 7–8 µm. Eukaryotic animal cells on average range from 10–30 µm. The largest  (extant) single cell is an ostrich egg and motor neurons in a giraffe’s neck approach 3 meters in length.
[3] Bacteria and their kin have a simpler, rigid cell wall.
[4] “Globular,” a somewhat outdated categorization, perform many of the vital roles associated with proteins. They are often water-soluble (forming colloids) as opposed to the wholly structural fibrous proteins.
[5] Amino acids are small organic compounds composed mostly of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. There are about 500 known types but living things, for unknown reasons, employ only 20. (Actually, 22; two new ones have recently been discovered. One is known only from seven primitive prokaryotes.)
[6] “Parts…coil into helices, other segments lock into rigid rods, still others act as flexible swivels. One amino acid called cysteine binds strongly to other cysteines, forming virtual ‘spot welds’ where the chain attaches to itself. Very long amino acid chains often fold into huge wads. Parts of chains loop out, double back, cut over to the opposite side of the wad, shoot out in a great helix, then return in a straight line to the center of the wad…. In many proteins there are sequences of hydrophobic amino acids that are pushed deep inside the wad, away from the surrounding water…. Sometimes…the hardest-working part of the protein may be at the bottom of a deep pocket or cave. One enzyme, for example, is known to have a tunnel into which it pulls the substance it is to break down. Electrical charges on the outside of the tunnel attract the opposite charge on the target molecule, essentially sucking the hapless target into the tunnel. The molecule is broken apart and the pieces are ejected through another tunnel, again propelled by electrostatic charges.”
[7] Their functionality is often dependent on the presence of a single metal ion (such as iron, molybdenum, or copper) whose specific elemental properties lend themselves perfectly to catalytic roles.
[8] This is the minimum amount of energy needed to activate atoms or molecules so that they can undergo a chemical reaction.
[9] Experiments and theoretical calculations cast doubts on this idea but it remains an open question.
[10] The mRNA, like a single-stranded version of DNA, is essentially a copy—lifted from a gene—of the instructions for constructing specific proteins to the most exacting standards. It acts as a template.
[11] Rensberger describes how chaperones “grasp the new, partially folded chain and push or pull it into one particular shape. Like a sculptor modifying an unsatisfactory clay figure, the chaperones massage the amino acid chain, nudging a helix sideways or shifting a loop from this side to that.”
[12] Robert Wesson (1920–1991) was a distinguished scholar and prolific author, and fellow of the Hoover Institute, a conservative think-tank. Best known for his work in political science, he was a dilettante biologist. This fascinating book, one of the earlier popular science books (MIT Press)to openly question neo-Darwinism, is generally thought to support a creationist agenda even though the author made clear that this was not his position. It has received criticism for its many minor factual errors, many of which were due to a widely ranging subject matter and use of outdated information to support his stance. Nonetheless, it is a fascinating and entertaining book that presents many valid and thought-provoking arguments.
[13] The discovery that mitochondria, chloroplasts, and possibly other organelles were former bacterial invaders (or undigested meals) turned endosymbionts was a major clue in imagining a route to the rise of eukaryotes. But many of their features, vastly different than those of prokaryotes, are enigmatic and remain unexplained.

No comments:

Post a Comment